WHEN WEEDS WIN,
WE ALL LOSE

Glyphosate:
Critical Farming Tool
what is modern agriculture?

Today's farmers use modern agricultural practices to grow their crops and ensure Americans have enough to eat.

Modern agriculture harnesses precision technology, innovative practices, and scientific research to boost efficiency, productivity, and sustainability in farming and food production. Facing increasingly demanding conditions, modern agricultural practices are the only way to effectively secure our food supply.

It aims to meet our growing food demands while conserving resources and keeping farmers competitive in a dynamic and global marketplace.

what is glyphosate?

As the most widely used herbicide in the U.S., glyphosate is the backbone of modern farming: a cost-effective tool that can be used safely as directed which keeps yields high, food prices affordable, and allows farmers to implement important conservation practices.

For over 50 years, U.S. farmers have depended on glyphosate to safely and effectively grow our food.

what you need to know

Glyphosate has been deemed safe to use as directed by U.S. and global health regulators for over 50 years. It’s one of the most extensively researched herbicides in the world, which is why so many growers and others continue to rely on glyphosate to help them safely, successfully, and sustainably control problematic weeds. Learn More About Glyphosate’s Safety.

However, over the last several years, a lack of legislative certainty has prompted conflicting state and federal labeling requirements and allowed the litigation industry to make a fortune targeting manufacturers of glyphosate-based pesticides with scientifically unsound lawsuits.

If we don't act, the future of glyphosate and other valuable crop protection tools and critical innovations may be at stake.
Ag Insights Survey Reveals Bipartisan Opposition to Litigation Threatening U.S. Agriculture
The survey, conducted at the national-level and across 12 states, examines sentiment on crop protection tools and related policy issues among U.S. farmers and the broader public.
NATIONAL FINDINGS
Full National Findings
or select state for findings
0%
of
farmers
and 56% of Americans oppose litigation that could limit farmers’ access to critical crop protection tools.
0%
of
farmers
and 70% of Americans are deeply concerned litigation against crop protection manufacturers will lower crop yields, leading to higher food prices for consumers during a time of record inflation.
0%
of
farmers
and 73% of Americans are more likely to support leaders who stand with farmers over trial lawyers on matters of agricultural policy.
food security
40%
of crops
lost
annually
Up to 40% of crops are lost to pests and diseases each year.
85%
of yields
at risk
Without crop protection tools, like glyphosate, yields could fall by 85%.
47M+
in
hunger
crisis
More than 47 million people in the U.S. are going hungry—a number that's risen due to increased inflation, and would only rise more without the the use of pesticides like glyphosate, causing higher prices and lower yields.
food prices
2.4X
food
inflation
Without glyphosate, food inflation could more than double—forcing Americans to pay even more at the grocery store. This would add up to $10 billion to the cost of food for households every year.
35-45%
price increases
for nutritious
foods
For fruits and vegetables alone, prices could increase 35%-45%—on top of inflation.
Farmers’ livelihoods
45K
farms
lost
annually
America has lost an average of 45,000 farms per year for the last century—a crisis driving up food prices, devastating rural economies, and creating increasingly fragile food supply chains. America’s family farms can’t sustain losing access to glyphosate and another hit to their livelihoods.
<10 cents
profit on
every $1
Farmers face razor-thin margins, with ¾ of U.S. farms making less than 10 cents on every dollar spent.
2-2.5X
in
costs
Farmers' input costs would increase by up to two and a half times per acre without glyphosate.
Conservation
2X
the land needed for
yield compensation
(800 million acres)
Without pesticides, farmers would need twice as much land to grow the same amount of food due to reduced yields—a total of 800 million acres, or 42% of the total land area of the lower 48 states.
1.2M
tons reduced in
CO2-equivalent
emissions
Since 2016, glyphosate has enabled reduced tillage practices, resulting in1.2 million fewer tons of CO2-equivalent emissions from farm machinery, as reduced tillage results in less fuel use.
~20%
reduction
in water
use
Glyphosate-enabled conservation practices have helped reduce water use for irrigation by nearly 20%.
supply chain
From critical agricultural inputs to semiconductors, medicine, and PPE, we must maintain strong domestic supply chains to ensure America has continued access to essential products.
In 2021, Sri Lanka banned synthetic pesticides nationwide. The result? Production of rice, a self-sufficient staple in Sri Lanka, fell so sharply that the nation was forced to import $450 million worth of rice to meet the country’s needs. Meanwhile, tea exports—a key source of revenue—plummeted. The ban was lifted shortly thereafter.
See the impact in your state
Select State
image/svg+xml
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
South Carolina
North Dakota
South Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Glyphosate Safety &
Regulatory Timeline
1974-2015
2015
2015-2023
2017
2023
Today
1974-2015

Glyphosate is introduced and quickly becomes the most widely used herbicide in the U.S. and globally. 

The strict U.S. regulatory process—requiring review by multiple agencies and hundreds of scientific experts—ensures that pesticides meet high health and environmental safety standards and are safe for use according to label specifications. Today, this process takes an average of 12+ years from concept to field. 

From 1974 to 2015, leading health regulators around the world repeatedly confirm glyphosate’s safety through regular comprehensive assessments.

2015

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subagency of the WHO, classifies glyphosate as a “probable carcinogen” without conducting any original research. This classification contradicts findings from global regulatory authorities, including other WHO entities.

IARC's classification puts glyphosate alongside other everyday substances like red meat and hot beverages and in the same class as working the night shift or as a hairdresser.

Leveraging IARC’s opinion, U.S. trial lawyers launch advertising campaigns to recruit plaintiffs for lawsuits against the sole domestic manufacturer of glyphosate.

2015-2023

Leading health regulators worldwide reaffirm glyphosate’s safety and non-carcinogenic status with new risk assessments. The EPA also explicitly rejects IARC’s conclusion based on a more extensive dataset.

IARC's classification of glyphosate as a "probable carcinogen" is criticized for data deletion, manipulation, and potential conflicts of interest, casting doubt on the integrity of their findings.

2017

California lists glyphosate under Prop 65 based solely on IARC’s 2015 opinion, contradicting global regulatory consensus. 

U.S. ag groups led by the National Association of Wheat Growers challenge the constitutionality of the proposed Prop 65 warning requirement.

2023

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules California’s Proposition 65 warning for glyphosate unconstitutional, citing global regulatory consensus that glyphosate is not carcinogenic.

The EU Commission reapproves glyphosate for 10 years, following scientific assessments by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which found no critical concerns for public health or the environment.

Today

Glyphosate remains the most widely used and studied herbicide, playing a vital role in modern agriculture by helping farmers control weeds, increase crop yields, and adopt conservation practices like no-till farming​. Without it, farmers would face skyrocketing input costs—up to 150% higher—leading to increased food prices and greater food insecurity​.